From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:24:12 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3a0c32c9406fd0a0ac1b4470be1302f8@ladd.quanstro.net> References: <78b2c5c6-7337-4a1b-8395-6c216b2d69cf@15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <3a0c32c9406fd0a0ac1b4470be1302f8@ladd.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Netbook Install Help Topicbox-Message-UUID: db32aa3c-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Feb 25 07:19:14 EST 2010, quanstro@quanstro.net wrote: > On Thu Feb 25 06:29:21 EST 2010, bitpusher2600@gmail.com wrote: > > Hmm, might be slightly above my head (I don't know what a node is). > > That aside, the boot loader fires up fine, and it makes it to what I > > believe is near the end of the boot sequence in fact. ad0 is my hard > > disk; > > queuevonqu.com/bsderr.jpg > > that's not plan 9, but it looks like a drive failure. too quick on the trigger finger. i think i understand correctly that the same drive works fine if the southbridge is in ide mode. in that case, i'm not sure what's going on. the drive is identifying correctly, but read/write commands fail. if we assume that this kernel uses interrupts to identify the drive, then the problem isn't interrupts, it's that the read/write commands are failing. that really does look like drive failure, and i'd be pretty surprised if the drive worked in ide mode. - erik