From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: <9fans@9fans.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 13:17:01 -0500 From: EBo In-Reply-To: References: <35f361459403c30512191d203286cd76@swcp.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-trunk Subject: Re: [9fans] =?utf-8?q?9vx_patches_=5Bwas=3A_9vx_bootimage_build_instr?= =?utf-8?b?dWN0aW9ucz9d?= Topicbox-Message-UUID: e94c7480-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, 26 May 2011 11:34:29 -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: >> ... it to high gives me a warning that there are to many procs for >> devproc... > > this is a bug in the warning message. > > ; diffy -c devproc.c > ... > + #define SLOTBITS 23 /* number of bits in the slot */ > + #define SLOTMASK ((1< ... Thanks, I have added this patch to my ebuilds. The system still crashes with very large numbers of procs (I think it is overrunning the static definition of libvx32/proc.c vxproc *procs[VXPROCSMAX]), but for now spawning 64 tasks is ok for development, but all the tests are shooting for 512. It would be nice to get all the systems running consistently. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. EBo --