From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:10:19 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20140124124408597647.a47c0e3b@gmail.com> <9031696b55153f1092b3e564463f31fd@mikro.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] New internal command for acme proposal (with implementations) Topicbox-Message-UUID: b777b8d2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:36 AM, erik quanstrom > wrote: > > once one thinks about major modifications, i think it becomes > > attractive to think about a new editor. i miss having graphics. > If you mean mixed text and image, you will end up with some sort of > structured markup language and a "word processor"! oberon certainly managed this with trivial layout. for example, it could be as simple as an interface that allows graphical applications inline with text. for example, ; lc clock.c ; clock& [display of clock here persists until killed] ; pwd /usr/quanstro/src/cmd/clock > What I want is support for complex text layout rendering (for Indian > languages among others). This requires supporting OpenType fonts, not > an easy task. Mac's TextEdit seems to do a decent job of this but I > don't like it as an editor. i don't see why complex layout rendering -> opentype. could you explain this? - erik