From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  9 May 2015 22:07:22 -0700
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <ea4b79bb4122555261bc7865993461ee@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <d6fc2233547eb3cd551d8d8ce22112ee@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <a5c5415571f488ee6f1dbcd336d37a2a@felloff.net>
	<c4cac4ae3086ef46e7cdcd173378c504@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<d6fc2233547eb3cd551d8d8ce22112ee@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 50de8ce4-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> however, after fixing things so the initial cwind isn't hosed, i get a little better story:

so, actually, i think this is the root cause.  the intial cwind is misset for loopback.
i but that the symptom folks will see is that /net/tcp/stats shows fragmentation when
performance sucks.  evidently there is a backoff bug in sources' tcp, too.

i'd love confirmation of this.

- erik