From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:46:31 -0800
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <eacf2bf59080287a57cd77d2bf19451e@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <547A2280.4020407@gr13.net>
References: <546981BE.90704@gr13.net>
	<CAJSxfmJhoSmzOYVP=w7bN9nf7CJ2u+hMUMZdkNVfYON3VUKU-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<547A2280.4020407@gr13.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Factotum vs SASL
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2f07ed36-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> So, how would a Plan9 solution for these usecases look like ?

plan 9 doesn't pretend that the hostowner doesn't fully control the box,
so it doesn't attempt to prevent the hostowner from e.g. turning wireless
on and off.

- erik