From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] wireless USB mice? From: Charles Forsyth Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:59:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <001f01c4f57c$12bc32d0$0200000a@urjc1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2a263792-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 >>USB 2.0 isn't supported is it?. Probably the strange behaviour of the second >>disk has to do with it changing mode to backwards compatibility with 1.0... >>Just guessing. i don't 2.0/1.0 is relevant. (the things are barely intelligent for 1.x, let alone things like split transactions for 2.0.) i've got quite a few storage devices to test now. (many other things as well, but that's another matter.) some advertise subclass 5, others subclass 6. most of them are bulk-only. some work provided Bulk Reset is not used. some stall the reply to every `transparent scsi' command. i'm trying to understand the devices that cause the last case, because it's the most mysterious, since i can't see what we're doing wrong, even by comparison with Linux source (as i work out how it's put together).