From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: I phantom Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <200309201549.32709.vthacker@tp9ug.jp>, <20030920153514.GA25835@folly> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 buffer overflow exploit explained in Phrack Volume 0x0b, Issue 0x3e, Phile #0x09 of 0x0f Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:01:14 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: 40e2060c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 markus@openbsd.org (Markus Friedl) wrote in message news:<20030920153514.= GA25835@folly>... > AFAIK, phrack 62 is fake, a hoax. >=20 > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:55:37AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > He exploited a buffer overrun in his own program. > > It would be more interesting if he exploited a buffer > > overrun in some system program, preferably one that=20 > > listens to the network. But then, he'd still be none. > >=20 > > Russ If you had actually bothered to read the introduction you would know that Phrack 62 is not fake but merely a change of direction. But actually reading..... (a zine, documentation, literature, openssh code) is 2 much to expect from anyone@openbsd.org. To everyone else on this list, I apologize.