From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ebc80bfd9d9bf5dab474ef1f2bc488e7@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bind, ns weirdness
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1030306202406.2863B-100000@robin.cooper.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu,  6 Mar 2003 17:51:25 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7c52272c-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

no, the name should remain unchanged.
if the name changes at all in the ns listing
then there's no point in keeping them around.
the whole point of the suggestion was to 
make the ns file effectively append-only,
so it shows a valid history.

russ