From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ebd2fa1d9bdc566b1775aa1520c9f148@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] skulker
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:59:58 +0100
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <668c983cf294caedeee7db4ff1bb71da@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a3f064b8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> We have a place for +a and a place for +l,
> why not just another place for +t ?

a) it's more space for something that's not much
used (and usually isn't relevant when using the file).

b) it's not uncommon to do something like:

	ls -l | grep '^d...x..x..x'

a change would break any scripts that do this..