From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  2 May 2010 21:31:01 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <ecc423d7b110a364b9f860b802cbec26@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <y2i13426df11005021614sa908605axfe43fae1919ea6a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <34542cb6839044e62f660db61e048fc3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<i2tb85d21141005021552v1686fbcetbca50d4d3fc83fa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<y2i13426df11005021614sa908605axfe43fae1919ea6a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] iwp94e proceedings
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1795621c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun May  2 19:15:42 EDT 2010, rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:52 PM, James Chapman <james@cs.ioc.ee> wrote:
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > I think the Currying paper appears twice. In the second case it
> > appears instead of the other paper by Ron Minnich et al.
>
> that's an unintended glitch; if you want the trace device paper i can send it

sorry.  my fault.

we had a production problem.  the proceedings are exactly as printed.
the paper is still up on iwp9.org site seperately, but no page numbers are assigned.
i'll leave it to the bibtex gurus to figure out how to recover from my
mistake.  :-)

- erik