From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <eddd459c96c3b9ac2311071305e38d31@lsub.org>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: "Fco. J. Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:55:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <c9aea15fa3a2815e365b47d79daccb3f@lsub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] store 9p session-only values using lib9p
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bdd4d8ea-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Sorry. I mean, "*Yes*, but ...".
I mean, you are right (unless you remove the raw files for non-spam mails
after some time; which I do not).

>  > in addition, doesn't storing mail your way increase the storage requirements?
>
>  No. Same file sent multiple times with different mails (which I do get a lot) only
>  consumes a single place on venti.