From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <edeabdde897cb454fabbe1ed41948c54@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] old fossil vac scores
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <da2d183aeff1fa908636bf6005baf3b2@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:51:44 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 859ea2a6-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Does that mean that `vac /archive/2003' gives a score that
> is not useful for flfmt -v?

Yes it does.  The archive that gets printed by
vac /archive/2003/0123 is only for that tree.
The vac scores printed by the archiver are for
the entire tree (rooted at /).

Compare mounting each with vacfs and you'll see.