From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@9fans.net From: Tim Wiess Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:10:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <922b610f917e15678e287488acf26e31@csplan9.rit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] sad commentary Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc31b84a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu >> functionality for plan 9 by name. >> >> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml >> >> not a single mention of plan 9. i hope >> this is an indication that slashdot has >> slipped. >> >> screens? 1978 called and wants its >> terminal server mentality back. >> >> - erik > > cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way > he wants it. Yeah, seems like the poster is more interested in something similar to what Octopus give you.