From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a040817084076942c70@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:40:03 -0400
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] venti question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0408161437100.23447@malasada.lava.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408121725120.31999-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
	<Pine.BSI.4.58.0408161437100.23447@malasada.lava.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d4d5cf50-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I was wondering what the implications of this would be to venti.

It would not be hard to move a Venti system to a new hash function,
especially if the hash function has 160 bits of output.

Russ