From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 11:12:18 -0500 From: Russ Cox To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries In-Reply-To: <773e440ebeb76f706118be8d73bfca39@orthanc.cc.titech.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <773e440ebeb76f706118be8d73bfca39@orthanc.cc.titech.ac.jp> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 40819a90-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > > I changed things so that the new keys get inserted at the beginning > > of the list. That should help a bit. > > When the factotum is the one started by kernel on a cpu server, > adding a new key to the beginning of the list might change the > authdom which the cpu server running in? > -- That's a bad thing. I put in a different solution. Keys with a disabled attribute are passed over when looking for keys to use during authentication. If factotum figures out that the key you've entered is bad, then it adds "disabled=by.factotum" to the key before asking for a new one. All keys append to the end again. Let's see what breaks this time. Russ