From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a05020720522551236@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2005 23:52:13 -0500
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] memory
In-Reply-To: <41F879E20001AB77@stateless1.tiscali.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <41F879E20001AB77@stateless1.tiscali.cz>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 045fd624-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

pro: errant user programs can't scribble all over the
kernel's memory and cause it to crash. =20
con: that makes it harder to simulate dos and windows.

russ

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:16:22 +0100, tapique@tiscali.cz
<tapique@tiscali.cz> wrote:
> hi,
> can someone show me the pros and cons of having kernel and user memory sp=
aces
> separated? just would like to learn...
> thanks,
> ++pac.
>=20
> --------------------------
> Pos=C3=ADlejte SMS p=C5=99es internet zdarma a bez reklamy. Pouze s TISCA=
LI.
> V=C3=ADce na http://www.tiscali.cz
>=20
>