From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a050217154270380b1f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:42:52 -0500
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] writing code
In-Reply-To: <21f67c6e38ea6a23caf7fb801589997e@vitanuova.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050217231738.GO77074@cassie.foobarbaz.net>
	<21f67c6e38ea6a23caf7fb801589997e@vitanuova.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4aefee46-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

it presents a clean 9p interface to user space.

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:33:47 +0000, rog@vitanuova.com <rog@vitanuova.com> wrote:
> > did you read russ' original post?
>
> yes.  i was left wondering "why?"  though.
>
> it's seems a bit like choosing a different fixed point for a recursive
> function (though i'm probably abusing terminology again here!).
> the work's got to be done somehow, and changing how the multiplexing
> is done doesn't really change the fact that the multiplexing has to be
> done somehow - it's just an internal architecture issue.
>
> i don't see what problem it was trying to address.
>
> hence my question to you.
>
>