From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a050405160520991d57@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2005 19:05:58 -0400
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Best Emulator to Run Plan9 in?
In-Reply-To: <20050405232727.A18920@mrwint.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <4252191F.6080705@golubovsky.org>
	<ee9e417a05040422416f340e89@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050405232727.A18920@mrwint.cisco.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 34a7baea-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> So it was definitely a plan 9 bug,  not a QEMU bug?
> 
> I seem to recall there have been problems with the
> QEMU ATA emulation,  to the extent that some versions
> of NT refuse to recognise the disk.

assigning blame is hard.  the two didn't agree
on how to behave.  it's easier for me to change plan 9
than change qemu.  

russ