From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a05051123266a590a3a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:26:10 -0400
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] man -t cat|lp takes 4min
In-Reply-To: <775b8d1905051123206efa7c0@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <22bb19f15d9940fd026539b04e5e0c6b@yourdomain.dom>
	<c7230677acc613ff3fb2e73ef934c609@collyer.net>
	<775b8d1905051123206efa7c0@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 49bb052c-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

while gs is often to blame, i doubt it is to blame
in this case -- he's using a postscript printer, so
gs shouldn't even be involved.

russ

On 5/12/05, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> only a guess but i think gs is to blame.  15 years ago i spent a lot
> of time constructing a postscript page that would take 5 minutes.
> and that was a 68020 dinosaur engine.
>=20
> use an older gs or just wait ... and wait ....
>=20
> brucee
>=20
> On 5/12/05, geoff@collyer.net <geoff@collyer.net> wrote:
> > I wonder if lp is waiting for something to time out.  You might try
> > `lp -D' and see if that tells you anything.
>