From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0507270609551ef8db@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:09:36 -0400
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] -mpm Again
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0507261955430.4219@malasada.lava.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <86299bd7f0d182c48e6e82e732ee5914@comcast.net>
	<ee9e417a050726092157e517fc@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.61.0507261955430.4219@malasada.lava.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 703c5afc-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Hm..  I guess this means 2e binaries run on 4e?  How much
> compatibility is there between the different editions?
> I guess not having shared libraries pays good dividends here.

Enough has changed that more complicated programs
would be a problem, but pm is not much more complicated
than cat as far as system calls go.

Russ