From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:14:57 -0400 From: Russ Cox To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: some Plan9 related ideas In-Reply-To: <20051017132208.GC29494@server4.lensbuddy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <19450.1125421653@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu> <600308d60508301033589f9f55@mail.gmail.com> <20051017071433.GA29494@server4.lensbuddy.com> <20051017124559.GB29494@server4.lensbuddy.com> <20051017132208.GC29494@server4.lensbuddy.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9b518168-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > "We added two (library) calls readf and writef that perform file I/O > besides resolving the name. We found ourselves calling them a lot, becaus= e > in many cases it's very convenient. They would be > an opportunity to "batch" walk/open/read(s)/clunk, which happen > a lot. However, this would require changing the kernel (even more than we > did for Plan B)." Well once you've changed the protocol to accomodate some form of batching, changes are good you'll have to change the kernel to use it. Russ