From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0511200635n10d297dted2a7db658c99630@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:35:17 -0500
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] wmii? 9p2000 compliant window manager.
In-Reply-To: <20051120123039.GB20958@wmii.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c69c8a2eeca7c01e011509a968e93dd0@proxima.alt.za>
	<20051120043521.69DA81B197D@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
	<20051120123039.GB20958@wmii.de>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aeb85a06-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> In contrast to plan9port we also link
> statically against libc.

Is there any benefit to doing this,
given that the rest of the system does not?

Russ