From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:12:52 -0500 From: Russ Cox To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] upas/fs -f /imap/... In-Reply-To: <0DF02C23-E21B-48E8-949B-34A52BCF8ED5@orthanc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <37dce6ddf2e5cbefbf8a246e9a19664f@proxima.alt.za> <20051126204810.8573E111351@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> <43F5F3CA-1947-432B-B871-D294C86729CF@orthanc.ca> <20051128013211.3FDEBDA182@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> <20051128024139.81CADDA182@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> <0DF02C23-E21B-48E8-949B-34A52BCF8ED5@orthanc.ca> Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2dec782-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Sheesh. The only reason that upas/fs uses "imap4" is that that's what the Plan 9 network database calls it. You seem to be in violent agreement about something that is utterly inconsequential. I changed the requested port to "imap" for the plan9port upas/fs, and I also added role=3Dclient to the various password requests. Enjoy! Russ