From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0512070417u3f06fc48i2fe4323c571bd564@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Dec 2005 07:17:59 -0500
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] const
In-Reply-To: <c1fbc6ded6b04f284121d7c75a39c827@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c1fbc6ded6b04f284121d7c75a39c827@quintile.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bbf47bd2-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I'm trying to find a reference to a tirade against
> the C const type qualifier. I think it was writtent
> during the ANSI-isation of C by dmr or perhaps bwk,
> (or was it was rob).

http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/dmr-on-noalias.html
http://tinyurl.com/8435y

The second (actually a Google Groups url) explains the first.

Russ