From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0601050048t34292913s197e2a5525408286@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2006 03:48:12 -0500
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] htmlroff
In-Reply-To: <8ccc8ba40601050043n24f6b8bbv29b8204cbee04e8e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ee9e417a0601042301p39f1ab91ra54442288f8ba7c0@mail.gmail.com>
	<7359f0490601042345p5a4e1abdj1bb77f81cd87aa2f@mail.gmail.com>
	<ee9e417a0601042356m54d7412bu65c79b22b11ab900@mail.gmail.com>
	<8ccc8ba40601050043n24f6b8bbv29b8204cbee04e8e@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d23bdf5c-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Wouldn=B4t a converter from troff to latex be easier if we are talking
> about generating html? latex is huge, but we already have it.

How does converting from troff to latex help with html?
Latex2html produces disgusting output.

Russ