From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0610051343x6d2197a4tcc5c518c2fc99da2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Oct 2006 16:43:13 -0400
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Binit and Bterm
In-Reply-To: <8eeb3016afcfba5a3719301de1824a5f@plan9.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c5d12f2312edc98140971001a3302a22@akira.nop.cx>
	<8eeb3016afcfba5a3719301de1824a5f@plan9.jp>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c5e2f3d4-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

The only buffer is on the stack inside the Biobuf.
There is no dynamic allocation in this case.

Russ


On 10/5/06, Joel "chesky" Salomon <JoelCSalomon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > since you are just doing reads then no i don't believe
> > the Bterm is necessary.
>
> So will Binit properly reinitialize its argument, reusing the buffers
> rather than allocating new ones and leaking the old?
>
> --Joel
>
>