From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ee9e417a0701180557g691c46fkca362718cca12764@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:57:45 -0500
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] IPv6 router advertisements
In-Reply-To: <20070118084431.A2407@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070117150621.B24320@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
	<4aa0555a8dedb6bbf9d1be8dcc8c0e3e@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<20070118084431.A2407@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 05ac6112-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> It seems drawterm doesn't know about IPv6 yet, either, so I suppose it'd
> be rather useless to me at the point. Basically, I'd like to make it
> easier to access a Plan 9 machine that is behind a NAT in IPv4 but which
> has its own v6 address. I wonder, how difficult would it be to v6-ify
> drawterm? I might spring up to that task.

It should not be hard.  It's just another BSD sockets program.