From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:41:44 -0500 From: "Russ Cox" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Anyone working on new upas/fs? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0fcccd3a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > i believe it's better, but it's awful hard to retrofit everything that depends > on the format of upas/fs files. ned, acme, faces, imap4d, pop3d, etc. that seems like > too much disruption. (but i'll bite if you rewrite all of upas :-).) > > is there anything fundamentally incompatable in nfs? ned acme faces all have the new code (in plan9ports) already. if you don't want to use the new code, you don't have to. it would be easy to change nfs to present the old interface too. i am not actively working on it, just describing it so others can if they wish. russ