From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:52:21 -0400 From: "Russ Cox" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] /n/sources/patch/spamhaus In-Reply-To: <124c9812f2fcc0eccc6fcb258c9ff5dc@quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080513172645.236AD1E8C4F@holo.morphisms.net> <124c9812f2fcc0eccc6fcb258c9ff5dc@quanstro.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: a6dd2eda-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > your solution for backscatter is a good one. but > how does it do against non backscatter? this > is also a significant problem. generally >100 > messages per day for me. content-based filtering works fine for me. > am i an idiot for objecting to this? i never said you were an idiot. i said that RBLs are idiocy, and they are. russ