From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  2 Feb 2011 13:38:55 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <eedb37c4131c320215524e3cead63b36@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimsq8GPGyOsk0WV4QeDsJnzoAO6GRgGPfu==9sE@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f3069c0f0c04613da64612ab236a0a27@quintile.net>
	<86ipx4s36p.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTi=-HGocKSwQpBVg2TfygYUk5khG8dsWvmnoOc9y@mail.gmail.com>
	<86ei7ry76s.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTin66np3zUfTewfPYX5fcRDSoPV=ufWEvrxCGejt@mail.gmail.com>
	<86zkqf46vz.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTiknRCp2M-87Xo0TmDT2VZuMEVapyd3fdJL70pmK@mail.gmail.com>
	<86mxmfuiep.fsf_-_@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTikpTUaKGAcP9p_Xso96c_cOF9Qui5rrXhUu1BDX@mail.gmail.com>
	<be3e16017566e26d4074ae69bc9b12c2@chula.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTimsq8GPGyOsk0WV4QeDsJnzoAO6GRgGPfu==9sE@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9,
	WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a8897e84-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Also, from this point of view, could pthreads be considered runtime for C?

no.  then every library/os function ever bolted onto
c would be "part of the c runtime".  clearly this isn't
the case and pthreads are not specified in the c standard.

it might be part of /a/ runtime, but not the c runtime.

- erik