From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ef224c45fc4c4270c5c60eb8c4ac6876@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Another namespace question
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030303174133.15491.qmail@mail.dirac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  3 Mar 2003 13:10:16 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 771198e2-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

It's an optimization that caught the common case,
which is mounting something new on /n/foo and
never looking back.  You're probably right that the
implicit unmount is more of a bug than a feature.

Russ