From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:38:21 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20131202212426.0730342a@zinc.9fans.fr> References: <5fc4ecdb1523a9dbda1829df0018500a@proxima.alt.za> <20131202183901.Horde.so34A23woqwLYjKomWz6Ag1@ssl.eumx.net> <74126e01b30ebb946afb3adcd8705e01@coraid.com> <20131202212426.0730342a@zinc.9fans.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8e6d5fb4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon Dec 2 15:25:33 EST 2013, 0intro@gmail.com wrote: > > > python on plan9 can't even handle the codereview extension. > > > > i believe that's false. jas' port does a lot of things the > > prior port does not. it's on bitbucket. > > I agree with Erik. Jeff Sickel did a very good job on the > modern Python port. > > If you are afraid to compile it, I'm providing up-to-date > binaries (Python 2.7.5 and Mercurial 2.8.1) for Plan 9: it won't compile unless you're running 9atom. or have integrated the (extensive) changes to ape, especially in the sockets area. - erik