From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: , <020001c3859e$d209f220$b9844051@insultant.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:14:01 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5512cbfc-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 boyd, rounin wrote: > in any case the courts don't really recognise a stream of, completely > forgable, bits as any form of proof: eg. al capone finally got done > for _tax evasion_, rather than hist other 'activities'. Al Capone predated the digital age. Tax evasion was within Federal jurisdiction, whereas most of his crimes were not. It is true that tax evasion was relatively easy to prove.