From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  2 Sep 2014 19:19:59 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <f1355196009f20dbbf2442e0a7ea43ae@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140902230443.0A3E9B82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <346c54679a6cdc9bb557724d8b93bbc6@quintile.net>
	<6e2a7a02201fcf3ea5d0d894d0d16916@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20140902200400.81EAAB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<14dad84410389f1daea3b71e632cb980@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20140902215053.Horde.Ajvc1qAreH0gSqu6LYJmDw6@ssl.eumx.net>
	<db849a10446d6804683a53529ac98cf2@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20140902230443.0A3E9B82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] silly question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 15245e2c-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I was mistaken.  Turns out neither do Unix systems handle
> leapseconds. Now if only ITU punts on leapseconds in 2015, we
> can let some future generation worry about leap minutes or
> hours! Sorry for the noise.

or we can give up on noon being a particular solar time.  this would
free us from timezones, dst and other complications.  just kidding ... maybe.

- erik