From: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@gmx.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:32:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f158dc670708101232w74771407td4ad0778adfa8319@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920708101216y225ca5e5oa06270d90e6d4271@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/10/07, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> after the .u debacle when I think the
May be the .u debacle happened only in your head?
> In any case, it would be nice if people considering changes to the
> protocol could be a bit more open about it so we could have some
> discussion about how much sense it makes, and we could avoid a repeat
> of the waste of time and effort with .u.
I don't recall you wasting any time or effort on it.
Thanks,
Lucho
Why? So you can hear your opin
>
> Best wishes
>
> uriel
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 11:42 Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 11:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-08-10 12:19 ` Iruata Souza
[not found] ` <2d66a95ea087868174cfdc519a48a2d7@9netics.com>
2007-08-10 12:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 12:36 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 12:42 ` Lucio De Re
[not found] ` <22bce9d3afa44ed70b739ea77d5d8046@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 12:48 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:18 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <f17c25af999bb93211e069e6109bb154@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 13:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:42 ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-08-10 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 13:45 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 15:51 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 16:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 16:39 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 18:16 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 18:25 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 18:35 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:16 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 21:57 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov [this message]
2007-08-10 19:02 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 19:26 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f158dc670708101232w74771407td4ad0778adfa8319@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lucho@gmx.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).