From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f158dc670708101232w74771407td4ad0778adfa8319@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:32:43 -0600
From: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@gmx.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920708101216y225ca5e5oa06270d90e6d4271@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070810114225.GF18939@nibiru.local>
	<2d66a95ea087868174cfdc519a48a2d7@9netics.com>
	<20070810123336.GG18939@nibiru.local>
	<a4e6962a0708100645o40d78c12lc3fc162cdbb22c45@mail.gmail.com>
	<5d375e920708101216y225ca5e5oa06270d90e6d4271@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a536af08-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 8/10/07, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> after the .u debacle when I think the

May be the .u debacle happened only in your head?

> In any case, it would be nice if people considering changes to the
> protocol could be a bit more open about it so we could have some
> discussion about how much sense it makes, and we could avoid a repeat
> of the waste of time and effort with .u.

I don't recall you wasting any time or effort on it.

Thanks,
    Lucho


Why? So you can hear your opin
>
> Best wishes
>
> uriel
>
>