From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f158dc670711141114w17d6280av64f89efa8423c7e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:14:23 -0800
From: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@gmx.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Ruby port
In-Reply-To: <13426df10711141105h6a65476fnc1f995d6f80792b1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13426df10711121101p7f1677a2qcd4dc4f18222117d@mail.gmail.com>
	<d99f5e1ac63934b6ac74f4a2c680369f@quintile.net>
	<13426df10711141105h6a65476fnc1f995d6f80792b1@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fa6cf0a4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

AFAIK there is one more unfinished attempt to bring ssh2 to Plan9. I
am not going to mention names ;)

On Nov 14, 2007 11:05 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:39 AM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
> > > Fact is gcc is a de-facto standard
> >
> > I'm still trying to understand exactly what you mean by this.
>
> I mean that people exploit its many properties, which makes porting
> code to plan 9 painful.
>
> let's see, where's ssh2 again?
>
> ron
>
>