From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Thrift RPC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:56:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f183927d5f08bf136d1cb0b2aaeef28b@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E2DB8264-FAE5-4918-A751-8F94EED0B8A9@sun.com>
> Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
> of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
> been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
> are really quite good for data serialization in the heterogeneous
> environments (especially when they are called JSON) and you
> really shouldn't be made to figure out how large is the integer
> on a host foo?
i'm sure i'll be flamed into nothingness for this, but a lot of what
the supposedly cutting edge does these days seems to me to be
exactly what we were taught only those reprobate mainframers
did in unix' heyday. the stuff i've seen recently seems fragile and
special purpose. i didn't see any ideas i recognized in the gfs
interview. i missed the organizing principles of gfs, except if they
are to just to go fast. it all seems to hark back to the days
mainframers put disk addresses in their data.
if we're going back there, just take me out back and shoot me now.
i want to remember some progress in computer science.
i maintain just a flicker of hope that computer guys are bad at
history. the days of mach seemed especially dark, too.
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-13 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 3:33 Roman Shaposhnik
2009-08-13 3:49 ` Tim Newsham
2009-08-13 4:33 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-08-13 3:56 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2009-08-13 6:49 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-08-13 10:01 ` Uriel
2009-08-14 4:58 ` Nate S
2009-08-13 8:33 ` Richard Miller
2009-08-13 8:42 ` roger peppe
2009-08-13 13:43 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-13 14:27 ` David Leimbach
2009-08-13 15:06 ` roger peppe
2009-08-14 3:41 ` Uriel
2009-08-14 13:19 ` matt
2009-08-17 15:27 ` David Leimbach
2009-08-17 15:44 ` ron minnich
2009-08-17 15:58 ` David Leimbach
2009-08-14 19:08 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f183927d5f08bf136d1cb0b2aaeef28b@quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).