From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] offered without comment or judgement
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1af614af35a2f189337e2c876ab9353@quintile.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTvk4aF-n5BWTJw-7D7lKXhY3708KFvsqcPpKC@mail.gmail.com>
> But you can do at least as good as these forms of ID. PKI requires
> knowledge of some sort of passkey. (I just worry about identification
> for people who are not smart enough to pick a good key. Which,
> unfortunately, is also most people.
My understanding is a passkey just needs sufficent entropy in order to be strong.
This can be a few characters drawn from a larger characterset - your password must
be no more than 16 chars and must contain upper and lower case numbers and punctuation.
Alternatively it could be a long string made up of a restricted character set - your
pass phrase can consist of any text characters but must not contain long repitations
and be of at least 200 characters long (say).
Thus a passphrase may be a quote from your favorite movie, a lyric or the like. This
can then be hashed into a higher entropy string (is this statement true?) used for
authentication.
I don't understand why modern security systems have an upper limit on passphrase length.
(waits for people who know better to tell him he is dumb).
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-29 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 22:32 ron minnich
2010-06-28 23:10 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2010-06-29 2:28 ` Wes Kussmaul
2010-06-29 2:46 ` Stanley Lieber
2010-06-29 17:13 ` Wes Kussmaul
2010-06-29 17:27 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-06-29 18:30 ` Steve Simon [this message]
2010-06-29 18:41 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-06-29 18:57 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-29 19:13 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-06-29 19:32 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-29 20:00 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-06-30 11:28 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-30 15:22 ` Wes Kussmaul
2010-06-30 16:22 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-06-29 20:09 ` Wes Kussmaul
2010-06-29 21:34 ` Steve Simon
2010-06-29 19:19 ` Wes Kussmaul
2010-06-29 3:46 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-29 8:07 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-06-29 9:14 ` hiro
2010-06-29 9:17 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-29 19:59 ` ron minnich
2010-06-29 13:43 ` Gabriel Díaz
2010-06-29 16:54 ` hiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1af614af35a2f189337e2c876ab9353@quintile.net \
--to=steve@quintile.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).