From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f256bf3a3f6344ad3e4740452b78311c@akira.nop.cx>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Tim Wiess <tim@nop.cx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:25:23 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20080416194804.E3B735B54@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f10b98e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:04:23 PDT "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> This is really an interesting discussion -- anybody think it could go
>> on the wiki? I enjoyed it anyway :-)
>>
>> A good example of how correct behaviour (in this case Plan 9) can get
>> you spanked.
>
> Er... "correct" seems a bit strong. Why is Plan9 sending one
> byte of data when it knows the receiver's window is closed?
>

Lookup TCP persist timer and window probes.