From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  1 Mar 2011 20:40:14 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <f2e7ff906f01f0e67c0a7d4a8be10940@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <28a5a9ad234d733f7758054ba3b7171a@gmx.de>
References: <28a5a9ad234d733f7758054ba3b7171a@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] realemu
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b64e7cf4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Mar  1 20:36:48 EST 2011, cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote:

> yes, i had one that did this as its first thing then chained into some
> other bios call.
>
> i have to look... i might still have the trace log.
>
> i do no attempt in detecting bad stuff.  its perfectly valid to enable
> interrupts in the emulator...  there are no interrupts in the virtual
> machine right now (might change if i implement pit timer).
>
> the list is just the stuff that was tested with the emulation
> and worked enableing video.
>
> might be a good idea to add "aggressive" bios behaviour in the
> description.

ah, i see.  i suppose i ment then to ask the question the other way
around.  what actions in the emulator are translated into real
action on the hardware?

- erik