From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f3166f99105c319b5355241aabb056df@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] directories in server registry (#s)
In-Reply-To: <bbdb78cd9c061241d2fade2c3822ad4b@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-cytvvmbypoypqiurmwqicbtsdn"
Date: Sun,  7 Mar 2004 11:40:02 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1ee45eb4-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-cytvvmbypoypqiurmwqicbtsdn
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Its been done before.  I think we just need to look back in time.

I think we need to think more about permissions before going crazy
expanding /srv.
--upas-cytvvmbypoypqiurmwqicbtsdn
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Sun Mar  7 11:37:22 EST 2004
Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Sun Mar  7 11:37:20 EST 2004
Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001)
	id F28CD19E17; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 11:37:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 34F8A19B43; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 11:37:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001)
	id 194F419DC7; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 11:36:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from plan9.9netics.com (unknown [64.91.109.37])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8C97A19D66
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 11:36:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <bbdb78cd9c061241d2fade2c3822ad4b@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: 9nut@9netics.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [9fans] directories in server registry (#s)
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:36:32 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on psuvax1.cse.psu.edu
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 

Would supporting subdirectories in /srv be a bad idea? It seems
because of '#s's global nature, it would be useful if an application (or its
user) could confine itself to a subdirectory.  Perhaps too much kernel
overhead for the convenience it provides? I think I just talked myself
out of it.

--upas-cytvvmbypoypqiurmwqicbtsdn--