From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Darren Bane <darren.bane@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <f32344$2rr$1@majestic.ukshells.co.uk>
References: <e3768ee04d0a1db76083e4f74b6f73e4@tombob.com>
User-Agent: tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX)
	(Linux/2.6.17.6-p4-swraid-quota-aic78xx-xtables-ipv6 (i686))
Subject: [9fans] Re: slightly OT: tcs or iconv
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7161089a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Robert Raschke <rrplan9@tombob.com> wrote:

!snip!

> I feel inclined to go with tcs
> because I can understand what it is doing by reading the code (and I
> feel confident that I can get it built on Windows).

If you run into trouble here, don't forget that tcs comes as part of
Inferno too, which already runs on Windows.

And to echo a later message of yours, "standards" and "best
practices" are at the root of some of the worst designs I've seen.

!snip!
-- 
Darren Bane