From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+fossi=suicide In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:43:07 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 941b91ee-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Do you mean srv -d /srv/replica ? On Wed Nov 26 16:33:44 EST 2003, mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca wrote: > Is it possible to 'undo' the srv command? Say if a script is used to run > replica it could tell fossil to create /srv/replica with -AWP, run pull, > remove /srv/replica and tell fossil to remove the posted fd. > > Running replica on an -AWP-ed fossil fd is really preferable, since things > like yesterday permissions changes just don't work in a situation where > I do a pull with my user being a member of the sys group. In my case > replica was unable to modify the permissions of the files in antiword/ > because they are owned by my user locally and by sys on sources, so > fossil wouldn't allow a chmod. > > andrey > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Presotto wrote: > > > with the new fossil (after you get past your linker problems) you can say > > 'fsys main srv -AWP unprotected' (actually pick your own name). This > > will create a /srv/unprotected for the same file system you are currently > > using. You can then mount that and use it to get unprotected access.