From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f330f89b9bd2ac2355853d7e7bda5265@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Dual CPU on Tekram P6B40D-A5
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <0761223355d8f8c71233c6e78c05814d@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:46:35 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 945d1f24-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> Anything has been updated of the Plan 9 kernel for this kind of=20
>> dual CPU terminal from ,say, about two years ago?

> I don't think any changes have been made in thhe MP codein that
> timeframe. Many other changes have been made, what was the nature
> of the instability?

The system hung up very offen at two years ago.
Now, yes, dual CPU machine is very comfortable, fast as much
as 2GHz Pen 4, I feel. =E2=98=BA

Kenji