From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: russcox@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] acme tags for shell scripts From: Gorka Guardiola Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:54:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: ef115fec-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > It's true that they're not uniform. I'm not sure what you mean by > "have to be the same". It would definitely be confusing if /dev/winid > gave you acme id's under acme but rio id's under rio. Yes, I meant uniform. > I agree if you mean that all the context should be in the name > space where it belongs. > > The reason acme sets $winid is that I put it in (originally for > the Getdir script, which replaced the builtin Dotfiles) while It should be in the man page anyway. term% man acme|grep [Ww]inid term% > I was using the Unix acme, and there I don't have the luxury > of per-process name spaces, but I do have per-process environments. > > I'll probably add your bind next time I'm in there. It would also be good after that to get rid of ID. G.