From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: Fco.J.Ballesteros To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] caught by replica In-Reply-To: <8842bdd8e931605322b284d9f00a61f3@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-xyijeigfrxlmrxtlrnimwugiuu" Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:21:25 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 819d6a8e-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-xyijeigfrxlmrxtlrnimwugiuu Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It could be I was running a pull -c for a subset of the files. Do you know the effect of a network disconnection while doing that? Could it affect the status of files not being pulled -c that are in the same batch? After thinking it twice, I think I agree that it cannot happen, so I think it all had to be a mistake on my side, sic. thanks a lot --upas-xyijeigfrxlmrxtlrnimwugiuu Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Tue Mar 18 19:15:27 MET 2003 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.16.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 43EE519A65; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:15:10 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com (plan9.bell-labs.com [204.178.31.2]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 1A1FB19A66 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:14:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Mar 18 13:14:44 EST 2003 Received: from 18.24.6.202 ([18.24.6.202]) by plan9; Tue Mar 18 13:14:42 EST 2003 Message-ID: <8842bdd8e931605322b284d9f00a61f3@plan9.bell-labs.com> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] caught by replica From: "Russ Cox" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:14:47 -0500 > It seems that the reason why we're not getting the scheduler fix is > that apparently we already have it, sic. > > What happen was that in a pull we got a disconnection from the network. > It seems that the files got added to the log, and not to the data base. > Since plan9.time was updated, replica is no longer pulling them. I can't figure out how that could happen. If you got disconnected then the copy operations should have failed. If they fail, then the time is not updated. Are you sure you didn't run pull -c to ignore the changes? --upas-xyijeigfrxlmrxtlrnimwugiuu--