From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:23:26 +0200 From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com> To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: [9fans] acme scrollbar Topicbox-Message-UUID: d7f213aa-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 7/3/08, a@9srv.net wrote: > I dislike this idea. I think for most people, most of the time, > the lines acme's working with will fit well within the width of > a window. Yeah, I bet most of us have run into longer lines at > times, but the interface is optimized for the common case. I > wouldn't like to see that go. > > Having the "undo" (paralleling the "undo" of a 1-2, 1-3 chord) > is very nice. The feature is certainly *not* "useless" for not > being 100% reliable; what's it' off by, a line? Even that's a > "good enough" job for your eye to find the line quick enough. > Anthony Then probably my eyes are just too slow:( It really doesn't work with me. But probably I'm getting old?!