From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f4d8fa40812021212q12c07f37jfa0e8a62346fbd2d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  2 Dec 2008 21:12:51 +0100
From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <da36689f4cb9854a6863a825aea80999@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1228245926.16585.17.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<da36689f4cb9854a6863a825aea80999@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] How to implement a moral equivalent of automounter
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 55df4b84-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> (hey, could you imagine a seperate nfs mount for ken's compiler?
> laughable, no?)

It would make a lot more sense than an nfs mount for some gcc tools.