From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0907130720k4ea87ba6mb6ac6bb2180633ee@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.64.0907110843190.5249@malasada.lava.net>
	<0F3972F5-D44B-4231-97FA-C6CE871B032B@gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.0907110901260.5249@malasada.lava.net>
	<140e7ec30907130124g1a0e4c90m6d83a08516d95463@mail.gmail.com>
	<a4e6962a0907130720k4ea87ba6mb6ac6bb2180633ee@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:44:03 +0200
Message-ID: <f4d8fa40907131344p44ea34d5kfd2e99537d96ab65@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] v9fs question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1d6a25ac-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Well, IMHO it would be nice to have it named (or symlinked as) mount.9p
> folks who mount as root could get the helper automatically. =C2=A0This
> would be nice for the standard Linux admin who is mounting crap as
> root anyways and trips over the DNS resolution error because all
> they are used to is NFS which mount has always done DNS for.

If they invest their time to find out about the mount.9p command,
won't they rather easily understand the DNS issue?